• Home
  • 主頁
  • About
  • 關於我們
  • Judicial Development Corner
  • Blog
    • Professional legal blog
    • Student legal blog
  • Contact Us
  • 聯絡我們
  • Related Links
  • 相關連結
  • Be EnGayged Mooting Competition
    • Be EnGayged Mooting Competition 2022
    • Be EnGayged Mooting Competition 2021

Latest  Judicial Development

Learn more about latest judicial development and recognition of LGBT+ rights in the Hong Kong courts, as well as landmark overseas judgments.

Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association Ltd: Cohabiting gay couple as a family in housing law

22/6/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Photo source: https://images.app.goo.gl/ptfRhPUHXCehznfg8
​
​Summarised by James Li

​Background
F had lived with his partner, T, in a homosexual relationship for 18 years and sought to succeed to the residential tenancy on T's death. Under the Rent Act 1977, the right to succession upon the death of the original tenant was granted to the "surviving spouse" or "a member of the original tenant's family". Following later amendments, cohabitees were also brought under the definition of "surviving spouse" being granted the right to succeed if they could establish that they had lived with the original tenant "as his or her...wife or husband".
 
F contended that he falls within the definition of “surviving spouse” or “a member of the original tenant’s family” such that he has the right of succession.
 
Issues before the House of Lords
  1. Whether F, being in a homosexual relationship with T, can be regarded as a “surviving spouse under the relevant provisions.
  2. Whether F is “a member of the original tenant’s family”.
 
Decision and Reasoning
  1. Persons in a same-sex relationship cannot be regarded as a “surviving spouse” under the relevant provisions. The relevant provisions of the Rent Act define the meaning of "spouse" also to include persons not legally married but who had been living with the original tenant "as his or her wife or husband". Since gender-specific words are used, connoting a relationship between a man and a woman, the relevant provisions do not apply to same-sex relationships.
  2. F is “a member of the original tenant’s family”. The word “family” was left undefined in the statute in this context, and it is for the Court to attach a definition. Here, the word “family” was used because the Parliament had sought to protect from eviction those who had shared their lives with the original tenant in a single family unit. Having regard to changes in social habits and opinions on what can constitute a family, a same-sex partner of a tenant was now to be recognized as capable of being a member of the tenant's family for the purposes of the relevant provisions for succession.
 
Comments
Whilst Courts are in general reluctant to recognize homosexual partners as spouses due to it being inextricably linked to the recognition of homosexual marriage, it is great to see that Courts at least recognize homosexual relationships as a kind of companionship worthy of special protection by regarding it as a form of family ties. This recognition is very important in that homosexual partners are more likely to be eligible for various statutory protections in aspects such as succession or inheritance in the future.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    October 2021
    September 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020

    Categories

    All
    Dependant Policy
    Family
    Homosexuality
    Hong Kong Cases
    Immigration
    Inheritance Rights
    Marraige
    Refoulement
    Same Sex Couple
    Same-sex Couple
    UK Cases
    Workplace Discrimination

    RSS Feed

  • Home
  • 主頁
  • About
  • 關於我們
  • Judicial Development Corner
  • Blog
    • Professional legal blog
    • Student legal blog
  • Contact Us
  • 聯絡我們
  • Related Links
  • 相關連結
  • Be EnGayged Mooting Competition
    • Be EnGayged Mooting Competition 2022
    • Be EnGayged Mooting Competition 2021